dtk dependency question

@font-face {
font-family: SimSun;
}
@font-face {
font-family: SimSun;
}
@page Section1 {size: 595.3pt 841.9pt; margin: 72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; layout-grid: 15.6pt; }
P.MsoNormal {
TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"; TEXT-ALIGN: justify
}
LI.MsoNormal {
TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"; TEXT-ALIGN: justify
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 10.5pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"; TEXT-ALIGN: justify
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.EmailStyle17 {
COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-style-type: personal-compose
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}

If you're actually in the state of trying to pass the dtk
tests, then you need to provide lsb_release.  This doesn't seem to be much
of a conflict.  There's really nothing to prevent providing it even on
distributions which are not certified - for example, I run Fedora 8 and Fedora 9
with the LSB support packages installed, and while it's not in the Fedora plan
to certify, LSB things work just fine on the distribution
anyway.

From:
lsb-discuss-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
[mailto:lsb-discuss-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of
Zhao, Fan
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:19 AM
To:
lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [lsb-discuss] dtk
dependency question

Hi
folks,

Glad to join in this mailing list. I
am a newbie for LSB and maybe this question is a little bit stupid, but I am
confused that dtk depends on lsb_release. If I have a distribution which is
waiting for LSB certification, the first step is to run dtk, but dtk requires
lsb_release, which is present for LSB compliant distro, but my distro is waiting
for certification and should not have this package, so seems I am in a dead lock
situation. Am I understanding something wrong? Appreciate your help very
much!

Thanks,

Fan